Sunrise over the curve of Earth, representing the global net zero transition

Global Net Zero Tracker

A weekly signal of how the world is moving towards net zero, based on ten transition factors and published evidence.
Latest weekly assessment

The current signal

44.4 / 100

The global transition remains meaningfully off the pace required for net zero by 2050. Deployment continues to improve, but policy reversals, fossil lock-in, conflict and physical-climate risks slightly weakened the balance this week.

Showing the latest saved assessment.

Global Net Zero Tracker · Trajectory

On the current observed emissions direction, net zero has no projected achievement year.

Global energy-related CO2 emissions are not yet falling. They rose again in 2025, so extending the latest observed direction does not intersect zero.

Current observed rate +0.4% 2024 → 2025
2050 at current rate ≈42.4 Gt Higher than the 2025 level
Required average decline 1.54 Gt/yr Straight-line path to zero by 2050
Global energy-related CO2 trajectory Gt CO2 per year · historical data, current-rate projection and 2050-aligned path
Global energy-related carbon dioxide trajectory from 2021 to 2050 Historical emissions rose from 36.3 gigatonnes in 2021 to 38.4 gigatonnes in 2025. Continuing the latest 0.4 percent annual increase reaches about 42.4 gigatonnes in 2050. A straight-line path to net zero reaches zero in 2050. 0 10 20 30 40 2021 2025 2030 2040 2050 Gt CO₂ 38.4 Gt · 2025 ≈42.4 Gt 0 Gt · net zero trajectory gap

Historical global energy-related carbon dioxide emissions used in the chart: 36.3 gigatonnes in 2021, 36.8 in 2022, 37.4 in 2023, 37.8 in 2024 and 38.4 in 2025.

Method and assumptions

Historical series: IEA global energy-related CO2 emissions: 2021 36.3 Gt; 2022 36.8 Gt; 2023 37.4 Gt; 2024 37.8 Gt; 2025 nearly 38.4 Gt.

Current-rate projection: the latest IEA annual change, around +0.4% in 2025, is compounded annually from the 2025 level purely as a trajectory illustration. It is not a climate forecast.

2050 path: a simple straight-line reduction from 38.4 Gt in 2025 to 0 Gt in 2050, equal to 1.536 Gt CO2 per year. This is an editorial comparison, not an IEA scenario.

Scope: energy-related CO2 from fuel combustion and industrial processes. This is not the same as total global greenhouse-gas emissions.

Source: IEA, Global Energy Review 2026 — CO2 emissions.

What moved this week

Positive drivers

  • Energy system transitionRenewables are expected to grow and overtake coal, although power-sector emissions remain under pressure.
  • Transport transitionGlobal EV sales continued to rise, led by Europe and emerging markets.
  • Technology readiness and deploymentSolar and storage continue to scale and respond quickly to energy-security pressures.

Negative drivers

  • Policy, regulation and public financeRecent decisions redirected clean-industry funding and weakened implementation signals.
  • Industry and heavy emissionsFunded decisions reinforced coal-fired steelmaking rather than cleaner production routes.
  • Physical climate and feedback risksWildfire and heat risks continued to increase pressure on transition delivery.

Ten-factor assessment

FactorDirectionImpactConfidenceAssessment
Energy system transitionPositive1.8HighRenewables continue to grow, but coal use is keeping power-sector emissions elevated.
Policy, regulation and public financeNegative-3HighPolicy reversals and redirected public finance weakened the signal.
Capital flows and corporate actionNegative-2HighCorporate commitments and capital allocation moved further from the required pathway.
Transport transitionPositive1MediumGlobal EV sales rose, despite pronounced regional weakness.
Industry and heavy emissionsNegative-2.5HighNew funding reinforced conventional coal-fired steelmaking.
Land use, agriculture and naturePositive0.5MediumDeforestation alerts improved, but durability remains uncertain.
Technology readiness and deploymentPositive1MediumSolar and storage continue scaling, while other technologies remain uneven.
Buildings and efficiencyNegative-0.5LowNo new evidence shows improvement at the pace required.
Global coordination and execution riskNegative-2HighConflict and policy fragmentation increased execution risk.
Physical climate and feedback risksNegative-2.5HighWildfire and heat signals raised physical-climate pressure.

Fourthmore interpretation

The world appears to be moving slightly slower than at the prior reading. Long-term renewable, storage and EV deployment remains real, but the newest funded and implemented decisions reinforce fossil infrastructure. The decline reflects deterioration at the margin, not a wholesale change in trajectory.

What this means for business

Use the signal as context for decisions: test assumptions, watch the factors affecting your business and seek closer evidence where exposure is material.

Evidence

Previous assessments

Methodology

The tracker is a directional decision-support signal, not a scientific probability or forecast. Each weekly assessment reviews current public evidence across ten factors, records the direction and materiality of movement, and preserves the evidence used.

  1. Review recent, decision-relevant developments.
  2. Prioritise primary and authoritative evidence.
  3. Assess ten consistent transition factors.
  4. Record direction, impact and confidence.
  5. Compare the result with the prior reading.
  6. Publish only after human review.
Use the signal, not the noise

Fourthmore helps businesses interpret sustainability pressure and decide what needs attention next.


View How We Help